Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from October, 2022

Chapter 27

  Practice set Having conquered almost the entire Europe, except Britain Germany attacked the Soviet Union, despite the Non-Aggression Pact, on 22 June 1941. As mentioned before, Hitler had always coveted the vast territory and resources of the Soviet Union. He thought that the destruction of the Soviet Union would take about eight weeks. Hitler had grossly underestimated the strength of the Soviet Union. In the first phase of the war with the Soviet Union, Germany, achieved significant victories Vast areas of the Soviet Union ware devastated, Leningrad was besieged and German troops were marching towards Moscow. However, in spite of the initial German successes, the German onslaught was halted. The Soviet Union had built up her industrial and military strength. She resisted the German invasion heroically and the German hopes of a quick victory were thwarted. With the German invasion of the Soviet Union, a new vast theater of war had been opened. An important development that follo...
Post a Comment
Read more

Legal Matter 4

  Legal Matter 4 The case of the petitioner/husband is that: O.P./ wife has filed an application praying for maintenance being Mies. Case 124 of 2015.   Petitioner/husband has handed over the power to conduct the said case on behalf of him to his concerned Ld. Advocate as it would be difficult for him to conduct the case by appearing physically on each and every date due to  the long distance between his residence and the Court.  Allegedly the said concerned Ld. Advocate of the petitioner/ husband did not take proper step after filing of the W/O which resulted into ex-parte order passed against the petitioner/ husband.   After being acquainted with the said fact the petitioner / husband sought legal advice and according to the advice of his concerned Ld. Advocate he has filed a Criminal Revision Application being No. 04/17 before the Ld. ADJ. The petitioner/ husband admittedly being an educated person and having no legal acumen misguided by his Ld. Adv...
Post a Comment
Read more

Easy matter 4

  Easy matter 4 One day, an old fox was sitting near a river bank. A goat came there to drink water. The fox asked the goat to give him some water to drink. The goat took mercy on him and came near him with water. But the fox was very wicked, he attacked her. The goat was very strong, she escaped from there. After a few minutes, a deer came there to quench his thirst. The fox tried to attack him too, but the deer was very swift and strong, he also escaped. Thereafter, a sheep came there grazing. The wicked fox tried to trap the sheep. But the sheep said, "You wicked fox! You better die in thirst. Though your condition is so miserable, you are not out of your wickedness. I saw you trapping the goat and the deer. I will not fall prey to you.' Saying this, she ran away swiftly. Moral: Always be tactful with the wicked people.
Post a Comment
Read more

Legal Matter 4

  Legal Matter 4 Seen the petition of complaint and the prosecution report along with forwarding report, arrest memo., personal search, inspection memo., statement of accused and medical slip filed by the R.P.F. Bolpur.   The accused persons, namely,, Bablu Sharma & Nasim Sk. are brought under arrest.   They are taken into custody and remanded to J/c till 08.01.2018.   The accused persons filed a petition along with vokalatnam with a prayer for granting bail on the ground stated therein.   Perused the case record.   Heard both sides.   Considering the nature and circumstances of the case I am inclined to enlarge the accused pesons on bail.   Accordingly the prayer for bail is allowed.   The accused may find a bail of Rs.1000/- with one registered surety of like amount.   Id. to J.C.   If on bail to date for appearance.      Let a report be called for from the I.O. regarding return of seized article...
Post a Comment
Read more

Legal Matter 3

  Legal Matter 3. The petitioner has claimed pre-emption on the ground of Co-ownership as well by virtue of being a contiguous land owner. My foregoing discussions categotically reveal that the petitioner is a co-sharer as well as a contiguous land owner. Section 8 of the W.B.L.R. Act, 1955 mandates that the notified co-sharers are required to apply for preemption as co-sharers within a period of three months of the transfer of land from the date of service of notice.               The Hon'ble Court, in Adhir Kumar Guchait vs. Maya Rani Ma jhi reported in 2009 (4) CHN 597 , expounded that Section 5(5) of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 does not contemplate service of notice upon the adjoining land owner. It is also not provided in the said Act that the adjoining land owner will get benefit in case of non-service. In case of pre-emption, non-notified co-sharers and raiyats owning land adjacent to the plot of land...
Post a Comment
Read more

Legal Matter 2

  (1) If a portion or share of a plot of land of a raiyat is transferred to any person other than a co-sharer of a raiyat in the plot of land, the bargadar in the plot of land may, within three months of the date of such transfer, or any co-sharer of a raiyat in the plot of land may, within three months of the service of the notice given under sub- section (5) of section 5 , or any raiyat possessing land adjoining such plot of land may, within four months of the date of such transfer, apply to the Munsif having territorial jurisdiction, for transfer of the said portion or share of the plot of land to him, subject to the limit mentioned in section 14M , on deposit of the consideration money together with a further sum of ten per cent of that amount: (2) Nothing in this section shall apply to- (a) a transfer by exchange or by partition, or (b) a transfer by bequest or gift, or hiba-bil-ewaz, or (c) a mortgage mentioned in section 7 , or (d) a transfer for charitable or r...
Post a Comment
Read more